Corporate Profile
Corporate Overview
Corporate Profile
Officers & Directors
Committee Charting
Stock Information
Stock Quote
Dividends
Historic Prices
Financial Calculators
IRS FORM 8937
Financial Reports
Documents
Annual Reports
Institutional Ownership
Financial Information
Financial Highlights
As Reported Financial Statements
Deposit Loan Composition
Peer Analysis
News & Market Data
Press Releases
Event Calendar
Analyst Reports
Presentations
Other Information
Information Request
Email Notification
RSS Feeds
FAQs
IR Site Menu
About Us
Investor Relations
Careers
Resources
Contact Us
LOGIN
Personal Banking
Business Banking
Menu
Business Banking
Industries Served
Government Contracting
Professional Services
Non-Profits & Associations
Insurance Agencies
Checking
Savings
Savings
Certificates Of Deposit
Money Market
ICS & CDARS
Borrowing
Commercial Lending
Small Business Lending
Commercial Credit Cards
Treasury Management
Merchant Services
Online & Mobile Banking
Personal Banking
Checking
Savings
Savings
Certificates Of Deposit
Money Market
IRAs
Freedom Prestige Banking
Borrowing
Personal Loans
Home Equity Loans
Mortgage Loans
Credit Cards
Online & Mobile Banking
Mortgage Banking
Mortgage Loan Officers
Calculators
Search
Institutional Ownership
Ownership > 100%
Copyright
,
© Powered By Q4 Inc.
Entire IR Site
Documents
Press Releases
© 2024 The Freedom Bank of Virginia. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Disclosures
Ownership > 100%
List of possible reasons behind the infrequent cases where we have total institutional ownership that exceeds 100% of the common shares outstanding for a specific company:
Double-counting
- On the 13-F filing, each institutional holder must report all securities over which they exercise sole or shared investment discretion. In cases where investment discretion is shared by more than one institution, care is generally taken to prevent double-counting, but there is always the exception. Another cause of double-counting is a company name change for the 13F filer where the holdings are accounted for under both filer names.
Short Interest
- A large short interest amount affects the institutional ownership amount considerably because all shares that have been sold short appear as holdings in two separate portfolios. One institution has lent its shares to a short seller, while the same shares have been purchased by another reporting institution. Consequently, the institutional ownership percentage reflected in the 13-F filings is overstated as a percentage of total shares outstanding.
A gap between 'as of' dates
- In the case where gaps between the 'as of' dates of the holdings and the shares outstanding arise, the percentage owned could be skewed due to a sharp increase/decrease in shares out. Again, this case doesn’t come up very often but the results are unavoidable.
Other possible reasons:
a) An overlap occurs amongst reporting institutions;
b) The 13F filing includes holdings other than common stock issues;
c) Mutual fund money is co-advised and incorrectly reported by multiple institutions.